La incidencia del principio de no autoincriminación en el procedimiento abreviado en Ecuador.
In Ecuador, several procedures called special procedures have been implemented in terms of criminal procedural regulations, this from the entry into force of the 2014 comprehensive criminal organic code, within these special procedures is the abbreviated procedure, such procedure is substance under...
Shranjeno v:
| Glavni avtor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | masterThesis |
| Jezik: | spa |
| Izdano: |
2022
|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | http://repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec/handle/52000/830 |
| Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
| Izvleček: | In Ecuador, several procedures called special procedures have been implemented in terms of criminal procedural regulations, this from the entry into force of the 2014 comprehensive criminal organic code, within these special procedures is the abbreviated procedure, such procedure is substance under its own rules, therefore it is necessary to identify if this procedure complies with the normative guarantees established in the maximum norm, this is the Constitution of the Republic and in turn in the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code, in that sense it has been decided to carry out this investigation that Its general objective is to identify what incidence the principle of nonself-incrimination has when the abbreviated procedure is applied, the problem arises as a result of the acceptance of the facts by the accused at the time of submitting to the abbreviated procedure, which could determine a possible self-incrimination , as a useful methodology The deductive method was used to go from a general to a particular analysis given that the constitutional norm was analyzed as well as the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code and in turn publications by various authors, a survey was also conducted of public officials involved in the administration of justice this within the multicompetent judicial unit as well as in the Vinces Canton prosecutor's office and in which it was obtained as a result in the present investigation that the acceptance of the facts does not constitute self-incrimination since the defendant is not coerced or threatened, rather benefits arise, such as the reduction in sentence. |
|---|