Derechos colectivos de pueblos indígenas y gentrificación a partir de la sentencia constitucional N° 2-14-El/21
The main objective of this research is to analyze the implications of Constitutional Sentence No. 2-14EI/21 in safeguarding the collective rights of the Tunibamba Bella Vista community in the Cotacachi Canton against gentrification processes. In this context, the central question raised is the follo...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | bachelorThesis |
| Язык: | spa |
| Опубликовано: |
2023
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | http://repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec/handle/52000/949 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| Итог: | The main objective of this research is to analyze the implications of Constitutional Sentence No. 2-14EI/21 in safeguarding the collective rights of the Tunibamba Bella Vista community in the Cotacachi Canton against gentrification processes. In this context, the central question raised is the following: What are the implications of Constitutional Sentence No. 2-14-EI/21 on gentrification processes that affect the collective rights of the Tunibamba Bella Vista community in the Cotacachi Canton? The analysis of the Court is highlighted, which determined that the communal Assembly's resolution that parceled and distributed the communal land among a few members violated the constitutional guarantee of indivisibility of these lands. Therefore, the first chapter proceeds to conceptualize gentrification and its different nuances of impact on territories at both national and international levels, as well as a normative analysis regarding the protection and recognition of collective land ownership. The second chapter details the collective rights of the Tunibamba Bella Vista community and its struggle for the recovery of communal land. Finally, Sentence No. 2-14-EI/21 is studied in the third chapter, highlighting the spiritual connection of indigenous peoples to the land, the guarantee of indivisibility that protects the communal nature of property, blocking divisions that irremediably fracture it, reaffirming the need to protect the fragile collective rights over ancestral territory. |
|---|