Análisis comparativo del código ASME, sección VIII división 1 y el código CECT para tuberías a presión en proyectos hidroeléctricos
In this paper was made a comparative analysis between two of the most relevant international codes that are been used in the medium for the design of penstocks in hydroelectric projects, these codes are ASME code and CECT code. For each code was defined the design proposed, as well as additional con...
Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | bachelorThesis |
| Sprog: | spa |
| Udgivet: |
2016
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/13107 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Tilføj Tag | Summary: | In this paper was made a comparative analysis between two of the most relevant international codes that are been used in the medium for the design of penstocks in hydroelectric projects, these codes are ASME code and CECT code. For each code was defined the design proposed, as well as additional considerations taken into account for a workable design. Under real condition of the design for a hydroelectric project were determined the thicknesses required for each code and verifying the stresses generated in the penstocks such as: circumferential, longitudinal and equivalent stresses, additionally, the Von Mises stress was verified through computer models that was developed under the finite element method in the Simulation Mechanical software. Finally, once have been established the thicknesses of design after the finite element analysis, it was again verified the stresses generated not only for the design pressure, but also for the hydrostatic test pressure ensuring that these stresses are more less than the maximum allowable stresses material determined for each code. |
|---|