El principio de objetividad en la actuación fiscal ante el derecho a la seguridad jurídica
The principle of objectivity is enshrined in Article 5 of the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code, showing its importance in the investigation that prosecutors must carry out in the pre-procedural and criminal procedural phase, to seek the necessary elements of conviction that allow evidence of the...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | masterThesis |
| Мова: | spa |
| Опубліковано: |
2023
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/10328 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Резюме: | The principle of objectivity is enshrined in Article 5 of the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code, showing its importance in the investigation that prosecutors must carry out in the pre-procedural and criminal procedural phase, to seek the necessary elements of conviction that allow evidence of the presence or not of the commission of a crime, and that in the future can serve as proof of charge or defense, so that the Judge of Criminal Guarantees issues a conviction or ratification of impartial innocence, an action that is not fulfilled by the prosecutors of the Latacunga canton, since they have forgotten their vocation of service and have placed the particular interest over the general, causing some constitutional rights to be violated, among them is legal security, which have to provide a guarantee to the owner of law to live in society and in the event of an event that threatens that harmonious coexistence, you can go before the relevant entities and claim and assert your rights; For this reason, the present investigative work deals with the theoretical and doctrinal analysis of the scope of this principle in the development of criminal investigation, for which the qualitative method will be used, which allows a detailed analysis of legal prescriptions and theories to achieve greater knowledge. on the topic addressed, and reach suggestions and recommendations for the improvement of the judicial service and the administration of justice in a constitutional state of law. |
|---|