Evaluación del comportamiento agronómico del cultivo de pepino (Cucumis sativus) con la aplicación de dos bioestimulantes a base de purines.
The present research was carried out in Las Mercedes del Norte neighborhood, located in the parish of El Carmen, Canton La Maná, with the objective of evaluating the agronomic performance of the cucumber crop (Cucumis sativus L.) with the application of two biostimulants based on slurry. An experime...
-д хадгалсан:
| Үндсэн зохиолч: | |
|---|---|
| Бусад зохиолчид: | |
| Формат: | bachelorThesis |
| Хэл сонгох: | spa |
| Хэвлэсэн: |
2024
|
| Нөхцлүүд: | |
| Онлайн хандалт: | http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/11685 |
| Шошгууд: |
Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!
|
Шошго нэмэх | Тойм: | The present research was carried out in Las Mercedes del Norte neighborhood, located in the parish of El Carmen, Canton La Maná, with the objective of evaluating the agronomic performance of the cucumber crop (Cucumis sativus L.) with the application of two biostimulants based on slurry. An experimental design of completely randomized blocks (DBCA) was used, with five treatments and five replications, with a factorial arrangement A x B (2 x 2 + 1), where factor A was the slurry and factor B the application doses, resulting in the treatments nettle and aloe in doses of 10cc and 20cc each. The most relevant results were obtained with the Aloe treatment at 20cc, with a stem length of 162.25cm, greater stem diameter of 8.80 mm, shorter time to flowering with an average of 28 days, better polar diameter with 19.09cm in the first harvest and 18.19 in the second, equatorial diameter of 5.56 cm in the first harvest and 5.12 in the second, better fruit weight with 326 g in the first harvest, 316. 25 g in the second, and the best yield with 14548.43 kg/ha, followed by the 10cc Aloe treatment obtaining better results in terms of the number of fruits per plant with an average of 6 fruits in the first harvest and 8 in the second, the economic analysis with a profitability of 278.05%, being the control treatment the one that had lower results in all the variables evaluated in the research. |
|---|