“Desarrollo de un SCADA para el monitoreo de motores paso a paso industriales”.
A SCADA development interface was the objective of this project applied to the remote local control and monitoring of an industrial stepper motor by means of a programmable logic controller (PLC), considering the interconnection infrastructure of the electronic equipment involved in its construction...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | |
| التنسيق: | bachelorThesis |
| اللغة: | spa |
| منشور في: |
2024
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/11872 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
إضافة وسم | الملخص: | A SCADA development interface was the objective of this project applied to the remote local control and monitoring of an industrial stepper motor by means of a programmable logic controller (PLC), considering the interconnection infrastructure of the electronic equipment involved in its construction. The methodology applied is based on a deductive approach. It begins with bibliographic research on topics related to the SCADA system, integrating key elements such as the INVT PLC, Wecon HMI, TB6600 stepper motor driver and NEMA 23 stepper motor. This integration is done taking into account crucial parameters such as the positioning, speed and direction of the stepper motor. In terms of communication, priority is given to the use of the ISO 4842 standard. For this purpose, the Modbus RTU protocol according to the RS-232 standard for SCADA communication is used. With the purpose of transmitting and receiving the data through KEPServerEX (OPC UA) software and at the same time this system is connected to Node-RED, a visual programming tool that facilitates the work in the SCADA, they consider the ISA101 standard. In the analysis and results, the experimental methodology involved in the design and configuration of the SCADA system was used. The results are based on two experimental phases: the first using a smartphone connected to Wi-Fi and the second using a PC remotely locally. During the experimental phase with the smartphone, a communication time of 350.5 milliseconds is observed, while on the laptop it is 235 milliseconds with Wi-Fi connectivity. This analysis reveals that the PC provides a superior communication response. In addition, it is concluded that connectivity in a laptop would be improved by an Ethernet cable, significantly increasing the time in communication. |
|---|