Categorización de alternativas Ecoturísticas en el Campus Salache de la Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi.
This document puts into practice a conventional way to distribute different livestock, agricultural and ecotourism alternatives that were determined geographically the physical spaces distribution of Salache Campus. It intends to show a model of spatial analysis through a mapping, to find new interp...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/8711 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Agregar Etiqueta | Sumario: | This document puts into practice a conventional way to distribute different livestock, agricultural and ecotourism alternatives that were determined geographically the physical spaces distribution of Salache Campus. It intends to show a model of spatial analysis through a mapping, to find new interpretations of reality, and to develop activities in a more balanced way and optimize Campus productive and economic development. The project represents a methodological model that aims to structure a categorization to develop ecotourism alternatives based on projects and resources in an organized manner that is being implemented. The project consists in categorizing and grouping different aspects the agricultural, livestock and ecotourism projects structured by lots and zones to establish a Salache Campus zoning, a geographical reference was applied that began with the respective points of interest that are the location of the Lots where they are placed different Agricultural, Livestock and Ecotourism projects managed by CEASA and CAREN faculties. Field trips were made, the entire Campus Salache was geographical, determining the limits and geographical location using GPS tools, ArcGis 10.2 software, laptop and a database, as a result, 4 zones were established (15.2 hectares high, average 9.1 hectares, 4.3 hectares low and 56.56 hectares mountain), 19 lots 671.375 hectares of land currently used (20 ecotourism alternatives projects, 23 CEASA career and administration projects and a space of 13 hectares destined to In addition, the activities were categorized into three areas that were; land, air and water based on their different zones, which resulted in zone 1, a total of 27 ecotourism projects 2 projects in water, 6 projects in air and 19 projects on land, in zone 2, medium with 10 projects on land, zone 3, high with 4 projects on land and zone 4, mountain with 3 projects and earth. |
|---|