Análisis financiero del propuesto del Gobierno Municipal de Santo Domingo y su impacto económico administrativo durante el periodo 2005-2009.

This work underscores the importance of analyzing and interpreting the budget during the period 2005-2009, research being conducted in the financial management of the municipal government of Santo Domingo. To perform financial analysis and interpretation of the budget and its economic impact over the period 2005-2009, we apply the following types of descriptive and explanatory research and scientific methods, analytic, synthetic, inductive and deductive, in addition to the Observation Techniques direct interviews and surveys. For the preparation of financial analysis methods have been used horizontal and vertical, using graphs and tables that can represent the percentages and changes which have participated in each of the surveys. The qualitative analysis to make comparative budget executed during the period 2005 - 2009, we note that the Revenue executed in 2006 for the period 2005, we can define the account current revenues had a variation of 15%. Capital Income had a increase of 37% and Revenue Funding presented a decrease of 19%, in 2007 on 2006, we can define the current revenue has had a decrease of 87% of Capital Income had a decrease 3% Finance and Revenue presented a decrease of 50%, similarly reflected in 2008 on 2007, we can define the current revenue has had an increase of 1015%. Capital Income decreased by 8% and Financing Income showed an increase of 459%, while for the year 2009 compared to 2008 can be specified that the current revenue has had an increase of 8%. Capital Income decreased to 25% Financing Income showed an increase of 90%. We also note that the amount spent in the year 2006 compared to 2005, Current Expenditures tube has a variation of 8%, investment costs increase by 25% and Capital Expenditure tube a decrease of 41% plus Expenses Financing Application presented an increase of 36% showing that 2007 also on 2006, the Current Expenses account had a change of 10%. Investment Expenses had a 16% increase. Capital Expenditure had increased by 17%, the Finance Application had an increase of 24%, which can be seen that in the year 2008 for 2007, Current Expenses account had a variation of 31% and Investment Expenses a 38% increase, and there was in Capital Expenditures decreased 7%, as expenses Account Application Finance with 20% decrease; where we can see clearly that by the year 2009 for 2008, the expenditure account Current had a variation of 1%. Investment Expenses decreased 21%. Capital Expenditures decreased 65% and Application of Funding 23% increase. To determine the economic impact on the community apply one type of survey that determined that did not get the basic works of sanitation and potable water and sewerage services to approximately 90% of communities. With regard to education, health, housing, roads and electrification are not treated cassis all sectors. Finally, after analysis and interpretation of the budget and the implementation of the survey, states that the management of the previous administration caused a negative impact on the community, thus determining which hypothesis is accepted.

• Hlavní autor: Rosado Briones, Azucena Zeneida (author)
• Další autoři: Ruíz Castillo, Sonia Elizabeth (author)
• Médium: bachelorThesis
• Jazyk: spa
• Vydáno: 2011
• Témata: Análisis financiero; impacto economico
• On-line přístup: http://repositorio.uteq.edu.ec/handle/43000/2687