Efecto de la inclusión con porcentajes (25, 50, 75 ,100) de residuo de maracuyá (Passiflora edulis Sims.) en el ensilaje de maíz forrajero (Zea mays L.)

The research aimed to determine the effect of the inclusion% (25, 50, 75, 100) of passion fruit residue (Passiflora edulis Sims) in the forage maize silage (Zea mays L.)A completely randomized design (DCA) was applied, with five treatments and five repetitions.The chemical properties were evaluated...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Chiriguaya Córdova, Víctor Alexi (author)
Formatua: bachelorThesis
Hizkuntza:spa
Argitaratua: 2019
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:http://repositorio.uteq.edu.ec/handle/43000/3823
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
Deskribapena
Gaia:The research aimed to determine the effect of the inclusion% (25, 50, 75, 100) of passion fruit residue (Passiflora edulis Sims) in the forage maize silage (Zea mays L.)A completely randomized design (DCA) was applied, with five treatments and five repetitions.The chemical properties were evaluated (Protein, Dry matter, Organic matter, Inorganic matter, Neutral detergent fiber, Acid detergent fiber, Fat).The research was carried out in the Laboratory of Rumiology in the experimental farm "La María", In (MS) the treatments, T1, T2 and T3 presented differences (p <0.05) in relation to the other T4 (19.96%) and T5 (17.12%), the (MO) presented higher values (p <0.05), T1 (90.53%), T2 (91.14%), T4 (90.37%) and T5 (90.83) had lower content.The content of (MI) on T3 (12.84%) was different (p <0.05), at T1 (9.47%) T4 (9.63%) T5 (9.17%), and that T2 (8.86%) presented the value less. fiber (FDN), T3 (58.37%) difference (P≤0.05) to the other T4 (62.63%), T5 (68.49%) while T1 (62.13%) and T2 (59.07%) did not register difference ( P> 0.05).fiber (FDA), through the analysis there was no difference (P> 0.05) the treatments such as T1 (40.29%), T2 (40.62%), T3 (41.81%) as T4 (46.85%) and T5 (55.02% ) if there was a difference (P <0.05).The analysis of (PB), recorded that there is a difference (P <0.05) between treatments T3 (8.63%), T4 (8.71%), T5 (8.41%), in relation to treatments T1 (7.71%) and T2 (7.74%), the fat content in T5 showed a better response with a higher average of (14.15%) showing difference (P <0.05) to the other treatments.Some of the variables increase their content when the inclusion of passion fruit peel is increased. Keyword: silage, corn fodder, passion fruit husk, chemical composition.