Efectos de tres bioestimulantes en el cultivo de pimiento capsicum annum l

In the parroquia the Cambio in the Campoverde Property, ensayò with the improved variety of long Irazu pepper to settle down the answer of this one to the application of new biotechnological products with microorganisms and enzymes that degrade the organic matter of the ground, releasing the nutrien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Logroño Apolo, Juan Javier (author)
Format: bachelorThesis
Language:spa
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/196
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the parroquia the Cambio in the Campoverde Property, ensayò with the improved variety of long Irazu pepper to settle down the answer of this one to the application of new biotechnological products with microorganisms and enzymes that degrade the organic matter of the ground, releasing the nutrients specially nitrogen, fundamental element in the growth and production of fruits and also the contribution of nutrients like phosphorus and zinc. The objectives of the project were: 1. To determine the effects of three bioestimulantes in the pepper production; 2. To compare the length to radicular with the production of pepper and 3. To make an economic analysis of costs/has. The investigated bioestimulantes were Agroconsume 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 l/ha; Vita Rac, 2, 3, and 4 l/ha, Biol 1 000, 2 000, 3 000 l/ha and an absolute witness. The ten treatments corresponded to a factorial adjustment 3x3 + witness agriculturist, these at random assigned to parcels following the lineamientos of Diseño in Blocks with three repetitions. The analyzed variables were: height of plant to the 15, 30 and 60 days, number of fruits by plant, size of the fruits, weight of the fruits and length by the roots. The results threw discharge significance in the treatments and the bioestimulante factor, dose and the interaction. In the growth in height the Agroconsume with the dose of 1.5 l/ha, reaching the plants heights of 79 cm to the 60 days, surpassing to all the similar treatments, results obtained in the number of fruits by plant and size of the fruits, but in the weight or final yield by parcel and hectare. In this last variable the three tried products were not different significantly. The fruits reached 84 weights of g with Agroconsume 1.5 l/ha; 79 g with 4 liters of Vita Rac and 59.7 g with Biol. 3 000 l/ha. As soon as one talks about to the effect in the growth of the roots, the three products did not get to differ statistically, of such form that the highest values with roots of 22 cm with Vita Rac,25.10 cm with Agroconsume and 23.40 cm with Biol and were obtained with the high doses of investigated products. The application of the Biol, in the studied volumes is not economic, when not generating a yield by above of the one percent. The greater yield corresponded to Agroconsume 1.5 l/ha with a benefit cost of $ 2,03.