Influencia de diferentes fuentes de nitrógeno en el contenido de clorofila y altura de la planta de banano hacienda Morella

The fertilization in floors dedicated to the banana production is essential in their development and production. The objective of this research was to assess the influence of different nitrogen sources in the content of chlorophyll and plant height of the banana crop in the hacienda Morella. A desig...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
מחבר ראשי: Moreno Peña, Jefferson Omar (author)
פורמט: bachelorThesis
שפה:spa
יצא לאור: 2015
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:http://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/3010
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
תיאור
סיכום:The fertilization in floors dedicated to the banana production is essential in their development and production. The objective of this research was to assess the influence of different nitrogen sources in the content of chlorophyll and plant height of the banana crop in the hacienda Morella. A design was used in a randomized complete block with three treatments and four replications. The dependent variables studied were the chlorophyll content of extent in Spad units from seven to 84 days and the height of the plant to the 30 and 60 days from commencement of the study, which was developed in a jig of bananas from 14 weeks of age. Each plant was fertilized with 33,3 gr with Novatec belongs today Solub 45 (T1), ammonium nitrate (T2) and urea (T3), each week of the twelve studied. Measurements were made every Tuesday and used the chlorophyll meter Spad Plus and the location selected was one half of the middle third of the third current sheet of the template. The best results in relation to the chlorophyll content of banana is obtained in the first treatment with 62,77 spad units and 2 with 62,53 spad unit which did not show any statistical difference between them, but if with the third treatment which reached 52,87 spad unit. Depending on the variable height of the plant to 30 days the three treatment were no statistical differences between them, being the better number one treatment which reached 1,32 m, the second treatment with 1,27 m and the third treatment with 1,24 m and at 60 days the best result was achieved in the first treatment with 2,72 m to the second treatment the difference was with 2,60 m and the third treatment with 2,52 m.