Estudio de los efectos jurídicos del allanamiento en los juicios de prescripción extraordinaria adquisitiva de dominio en el cantón pasaje de la provincia de el oro en el año 2012.
A conflict exists in the jurisdictional exercise that is developed when the judges have to approve in sentence the levelling from the defendant to the actor's pretense in a process of acquisitive extraordinary prescription of domain in fact, the imperium jurisdiction authorizes the judge to tak...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2015
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/4577 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
添加標簽 | 總結: | A conflict exists in the jurisdictional exercise that is developed when the judges have to approve in sentence the levelling from the defendant to the actor's pretense in a process of acquisitive extraordinary prescription of domain in fact, the imperium jurisdiction authorizes the judge to take that determination without opening the cause on approval since the same civil code prepares it. What happens is that in many domestic cantons ordinances that limit to carry out steps of sale and purchase of fractions of lands that don't fulfill certain minimum dimensions exist before this the contracting parties simulate a judicial controversy in that the salesperson is demanded by the buyer by acquisitive extraordinary prescription of domain, then the salesperson is leveled on demand and the judge approves this levelling in sentence, that that evidently constitutes a wrong use of the juridical institutions since possession of the thing it never existed on the one that the Judge grants the property, that that in turn harms the rights of the decentralized Autonomous Governments of regulating the use of the urban floor. |
|---|