The innovation in the use of language in context changes the way professors think
The following article is an expansion of a topic presented at the 3rd International Conference fortheInnovation in Education, held at Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE). Not only is it broad but it also contains arguments that deserve to be highlighted and further examined. In the same way theana...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | article |
| Hizkuntza: | spa |
| Argitaratua: |
2019
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CATEDRA/article/view/1275 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| Gaia: | The following article is an expansion of a topic presented at the 3rd International Conference fortheInnovation in Education, held at Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE). Not only is it broad but it also contains arguments that deserve to be highlighted and further examined. In the same way theanalysis of “pragmatic discourse” is an important exercise, therefore, it is aprofessor’sability to create new pedagogical strategies to improve teaching methods. Further, a thorough proposal of a training program for university instructors regarding language in context is important as well. As such, the aim of thisarticle is toelucidate how teachers, after having receivedtraining in the usage of language in context, improve their reading comprehension processes and change their thought processes with regard to their pedagogical practices.The methodology of this study focuses on a theoretical debate of the usage of language in context and employs quantitative analysis regarding teacher training of critical reading and the development of critical thinking for instructors in Pichincha, Esmeraldas, and Santo Domingo provinces. Such traininginvolvesa certain command of language in context.The questionnaire employed in this study to collect data from the analysis of a discourse through the usage of language in context revealed a 91% improvement intheteachers’ capacity for analysis. Thus, this investigation should be considered of high impact; the metacognitive questions that were posed to the teachers at the end of their training made them thinkon their reading comprehension processes and pedagogical practices |
|---|