Constitutionalism of disaster in Ecuador: state conduct and sentences during the COVID-19 health emergency

This article reviews the concept of “disaster constitutionalism” in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario in Ecuador. The predominant feature of this scenario was public actors immersed in a context in which the rules of legality, administrative controls and (emergency) solutions generated situations of sy...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Guerrero Salgado, Efrén Ernesto (author)
Outros autores: Rodríguez Estévez, Felipe (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:spa
Publicado: 2022
Subjects:
Acceso en liña:https://revistas.iaen.edu.ec/index.php/estado_comunes/article/view/251
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
Descripción
Summary:This article reviews the concept of “disaster constitutionalism” in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario in Ecuador. The predominant feature of this scenario was public actors immersed in a context in which the rules of legality, administrative controls and (emergency) solutions generated situations of systemic inefficiency. This article examined the inability to address the needs of citizens and the violation of the constitutionally established principle of legality. With that aim, this research used the concept of “necroconstitutionalism”, which refers to a power that denies politics, subjects, and their rights. This paper reviewed Constitutional Court of Ecuador (CCE) rulings, especially sentence No. 34-20-IS/20, regarding the use of public funds to meet emergency needs. In conclusion and within public administration, disaster constitutionalism restricts living conditions, generates institutions, and undermines the rights of citizens.